Size: 3236
Comment:
|
Size: 3354
Comment: Added myself and fixed syntax for others
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 22: | Line 22: |
|| Augie Fackler || US East Coast || (./) || (./) || || (./)* || (./) || (./)* || (./) || * Monday and Wednesday I'm unlikely to be able to focus until around 1400 America/New_York. Other days all easy. || || Jörg Sonnenberger || Central Europe || || (./)* || (./) || (./) || (./) || (./) || (./) || || |
|| Augie Fackler || US East Coast || (./) || (./) || || (./) * || (./) || (./) * || (./) || * Monday and Wednesday I'm unlikely to be able to focus until around 1400 America/New_York. Other days all easy. || || Jörg Sonnenberger || Central Europe || || (./) * || (./) || (./) || (./) || (./) || (./) || || |
Line 25: | Line 25: |
|| Rodrigo Damazio Bovendorp || US West Coast || (./) || {X} || (./) || (./) || (./) || (./) || (./) || || |
Note:
This page is primarily intended for developers of Mercurial.
5.6 Sprint
Contents
Subscribe to this page so you don't miss updates!
1. Date and location
This sprint will be held online. Perhaps the week of November 2 (right after the 5.6 release)? Let's see how that works for people and we can change otherwise.
To allow people from many different time zones to participate, we'll probably have to choose topics first and then choose a time zone for each topic that best fits the participants interested in that topic.
1.1. People Availability
Name |
Time Zone |
Nov 2 |
Nov 3 |
Nov 4 |
Nov 5 |
Nov 6 |
Nov 7 |
Nov 8 |
Notes |
Martin von Zweigbergk |
US West Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Sipek |
US East Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augie Fackler |
US East Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Monday and Wednesday I'm unlikely to be able to focus until around 1400 America/New_York. Other days all easy. |
Jörg Sonnenberger |
Central Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matt Harbison |
US East Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodrigo Damazio Bovendorp |
US West Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Attendance
fill me when dates have been picked
3. Possible Topics
Important things we want to discuss: (add your own)
3.1. Tags
Multiple large users have their own overwrite of Mercurial tag system. It is worth reviewing what and why they do it and maybe make plan to improve the situation accordingly.
3.2. Releases
Right now durin42 is doing all the releases, and has some help doing release notes. It'd be nice to have others start rolling releases. Is anyone interested? Can we automate this more?
3.3. Obsshelve
What needs to be done to get this to replace current shelve?
3.4. Replication-friendly repository format
durin42 is interested in (and has a handwave of a design for) a storage layer that would be replication-friendly. Basically, "how could we restructure repo storage so that it would be safe to put in {Dropbox,CIFS,etc}"?
3.5. More command "namespace"
Right now we have the normal namespace and the "debug" namespace. It would be useful to have a couple more explicit namespace with their own guarantee. For example one dedicated to maintenance command (debugupdatecache, debugrebuildstate, debugupgraderepo, etc…) and one for other tooling (eg: debugcompletion)
3.6. Google's --changeset-as-wdir feature
Multiple contributors from google are trying to have various existing commands being able to consider a revision in place of the working copy. This is an interesting and powerful idea that is worth discussing in greater length. See plan page.
4. Sprint Notes
General overview (drop the anti spam part): https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/sprint-hgx.y-NOSPAMREMOVETHATLASTPAST ( update URL)
The table below is an attempt to gather written summary of discussion
Session theme |
notes/result |
People who know what happened |