Size: 4156
Comment:
|
Size: 5009
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 29: | Line 29: |
|| Raphaël Gomès || UTC+1 || (./) || <!> * || (./) || (./) || (./) || (./) || (./) || * Same as Pierre-Yves || | |
Line 73: | Line 74: |
=== Dropping Python 2 === When do we do it? Do we drop everything compat that is not 3.5.4+? Are we waiting on PyOxidizer? === State of Rust === - Discuss the current state of the project and what the features underway will become in a few months. - Discuss merging or not merging rhg/chg/hg with the help of PyOxidizer === Mercurial layered architecture === Alphare: slowly refactoring Mercurial into a two-layer codebase is something I've been thinking about over the past few months since the Rust implementation has adopted this split of core + consumer from the get-go. This is not a call to change everything right now but more of a "what do you think about this as a general direction in the next few years?". |
Note:
This page is primarily intended for developers of Mercurial.
5.6 Sprint
Contents
Subscribe to this page so you don't miss updates!
1. Date and location
This sprint will be held online. Perhaps the week of November 2 (right after the 5.6 release)? Let's see how that works for people and we can change otherwise.
To allow people from many different time zones to participate, we'll probably have to choose topics first and then choose a time zone for each topic that best fits the participants interested in that topic.
1.1. People Availability
Name |
Time Zone |
Nov 2 |
Nov 3 |
Nov 4 |
Nov 5 |
Nov 6 |
Nov 7 |
Nov 8 |
Notes |
Martin von Zweigbergk |
US West Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Sipek |
US East Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augie Fackler |
US East Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Monday and Wednesday I'm unlikely to be able to focus until around 1400 America/New_York. Other days all easy. |
Jörg Sonnenberger |
Central Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matt Harbison |
US East Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodrigo Damazio Bovendorp |
US West Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danny Hooper |
US West Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manuel Jacob |
Central Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pierre-Yves David |
UTC+1 |
|
<!>* |
|
|
|
|
|
* Tuesday is a meeting minefield already. But still a lot of time available. |
Raphaël Gomès |
UTC+1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Same as Pierre-Yves |
2. Attendance
fill me when dates have been picked
3. Possible Topics
Important things we want to discuss: (add your own)
3.1. Tags
Multiple large users have their own overwrite of Mercurial tag system. It is worth reviewing what and why they do it and maybe make plan to improve the situation accordingly.
3.2. Releases
Right now durin42 is doing all the releases, and has some help doing release notes. It'd be nice to have others start rolling releases. Is anyone interested? Can we automate this more?
3.3. Shelve using archived phase
What needs to be done to get this to replace current shelve?
3.4. Replication-friendly repository format
durin42 is interested in (and has a handwave of a design for) a storage layer that would be replication-friendly. Basically, "how could we restructure repo storage so that it would be safe to put in {Dropbox,CIFS,etc}"?
3.5. Combined revlog
(added by Pierre-YvesDavid, this is orthogonal to the previous format proposal)
Storing multiple files history into the same filelog could help our disk footsprint and performance.
It "just" mean to add an extra "key" to address content, logic to find the right filelog and some logic adjustement through the code.
I have no hard plan yet, but I wanted to discuss that more broadly.
3.6. More command "namespace"
Right now we have the normal namespace and the "debug" namespace. It would be useful to have a couple more explicit namespace with their own guarantee. For example one dedicated to maintenance command (debugupdatecache, debugrebuildstate, debugupgraderepo, etc…) and one for other tooling (eg: debugcompletion)
3.7. Google's --changeset-as-wdir feature
Multiple contributors from google are trying to have various existing commands being able to consider a revision in place of the working copy. This is an interesting and powerful idea that is worth discussing in greater length. See plan page.
3.8. Dropping Python 2
When do we do it? Do we drop everything compat that is not 3.5.4+? Are we waiting on PyOxidizer?
3.9. State of Rust
- Discuss the current state of the project and what the features underway will become in a few months. - Discuss merging or not merging rhg/chg/hg with the help of PyOxidizer
3.10. Mercurial layered architecture
Alphare: slowly refactoring Mercurial into a two-layer codebase is something I've been thinking about over the past few months since the Rust implementation has adopted this split of core + consumer from the get-go. This is not a call to change everything right now but more of a "what do you think about this as a general direction in the next few years?".
4. Sprint Notes
General overview (drop the anti spam part): https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/sprint-hg5.6-NOSPAMREMOVETHATLASTPAST
The table below is an attempt to gather written summary of discussion
Session theme |
notes/result |
People who know what happened |